In the UK's free Telecoms market, in practice, consumers find out how much a call actually costs only after they have placed (purchased) a call. This is not the case elsewhere e.g. supermarkets, where the price is clearly and conveniently displayed in an unambiguous manner, including taxes, just before purchase.
Even the long established telecom retailers publish price tables that are both complex and opaque, to all but the highly numerate. For example, look at BT's Residential Price List. I am sure you'll agree, that this 30-page document is complicated and Flextel believes it to be wholly inaccessible to the average consumer. However, this document excludes important pricing information for special numbers, such as Freephone, Personal and NTS services. To get accurate pricing for these services, the BT's Residential and Business special number call price list must be consulted. This 60-page tome is a serious challenge to everyone, except rocket scientists. How then can Ofcom (and the EU commission) expect the market to function properly, with such dense price opacity?
Economists worldwide would agree that without good price transparency, there can be no effective competitive market. In today's telecom markets call pricing is so opaque that many consumers are confused as to how much they will pay and are unable to make a rational purchasing decision. So, most mobile consumers either find out that their pre-paid credit has been unexpectedly used up, or wait one month and view their bills with dismay. Both may have dialled an overpriced 08xx number, including the not-so-free, freephone calls. Article 8 (4d) of the EU Framework Directive calls for transparency of tariffs. This has yet to be widely delivered in the UK or anywhere in Europe. As a result of opaque pricing in European Telecoms, call price competition is a myth and the market therefore remains highly inefficient market. The evidence is the imposition of wholesale and retail price controls bu Ofcom at the EU.
Acknowledging the problem, the Commission of the European Union is taking at least some action. Driven by the office of Viviane Reding the commission has had to intervene and place controls on the retail price of mobile roaming charges. Ofcom has adopted a different approach and tried to impose controls on mobile and other wholesale termination tariffs, which has been challenged in the UK competition courts (CAT).
However, Flextel believes that price regulation is wrong, it just kills grass roots competition and is simply a symptom of market failure. Indeed, the imposition of retail and wholesale price controls by regulators is an admission of failure by the regulators themselves. So, Flextel considers that the EU and Ofcom are both wrong to try to regulate either retail or wholesale prices, which serve to distort or kill competition. Last year, the CAT strongly criticised Ofcom for its attempt to foist wholesale mobile termination rates, based on a ludicrous gains from trade argument. The CAT stated that this was a "serious error by OFCOM" and that "OFCOM ...committed an error of law". Desperate times indeed when a Regulator is driven beyond the edge of its powers and acts "unreasonably".Flextel believes that what is needed, as a matter of urgency, is full and effective price transparency, instead of sticking plaster solutions. In simple terms Ofcom and the EU should deal with the underlying cause of excessive and rapacious pricing and regulate for effective competition. They can then sit back and let informed consumers and competitive market forces do the rest.
"price or the manner in which the price is calculated" is a consideration "if it or its overall presentation in any way deceives or is likely to deceive the average consumer" such that "it causes or is likely to cause the average consumer to take a transactional decision he would not have taken otherwise".Obviously placing a call is clearly a "transactional decision". Even in bundled call packages an "in-bundle call" uses up the bundle limit and therefore increases the likelihood of the limit being breached and costs being incurred. In any case many call types are outside such bundles e.g. freephone calls (that are charged on many mobile services, for apparently no good reason other than corporate greed). So deciding to place a call will depend on its price, which clearly should be to hand at the point of sale i.e. before a consumer decides to agree to pay for it by dialling (i.e. makes a transactional decision and places the call). The detailed regulations are available here.
For more than two years Flextel has offered a solution, which it believes might pave the way forward. Flextel's technical experts have shown a simple, and effective, low cost migration path from today's 'rip-off' market to a better, fairer future. Flextel has written to Ofcom suggesting this solution on more than five occasions, but Ofcom do not seem to be listening.
Ofcom argue that their General Conditions (GCs), requiring OCPs to provide clear tariff information, is adequate. I am sure you have seen the BT example above, which Ofcom claim fully complies with its complex regulations, and can agree that this approach is unacceptable. In fact the GC that covers Number Translation Service (0844, 0845 and 0870 and 0871 phone numbers) pricing have been in place since 2006 and are still not effective. So much so that, in 2008, Ofcom had to open a second investigation into compliance with General Condition 14.2.
Over the twenty years that have elapsed since opening up the market to competition. Tariffs have gradually become increasingly complex, but no one has seriously asked the question... "Can we deliver Call Price Labelling yet?" The answer is "of course we can!". Today, there is probably more computing power in your mobile phone, than in BT's billing system in 1984. In today's computer driven world call price labelling is not only feasible, but verging on the trivial. It all depends on the technical approach and, critically, choosing compatible tariff structures and compatible reseller incentive schemes.
To say we cannot deliver Call Price Labelling because the reseller and tariff structure are too complex is putting the "cart before the horse". With hindsight, the UK could have introduced this consumer protection mechanism soon after 1984. Then, the tricky tariffs, punitive 08xx pricing and random reseller deals would perhaps never have become so deeply rooted. It is simply unacceptable to state it can't be done because of established practice. I say to Ofcom, introduce Call Price Labelling, so giving the consumer the comfort of a simple call price check and simplified tariffs will follow.
Today finding out call prices is challenging at best. For example, to find out the price of a call is it reasonable, ethical or honest for consumers to have to consider...
As explained earlier, to empower and protect consumers and to gain an efficient telecoms market there must be good price transparency. It follows that the optimal method of delivering this is to let the consumer check the price of any call, before deciding to place it, in an accessible and convenient manner.
How can this be done? ...simple: From their own ordinary phone or mobile:
From a Mobile you could even:
However, unsurprisingly, the incumbent and entrenched telecom providers have said it's all too complex and too expensive to implement. Are they to be trusted in this viewpoint, considering they might have a prejudicial interest in protecting market-share, using such rapacious pricing and complex opaque tariffs? Flextel believes this stance is nothing but a facade, designed to protect lucrative cash-cow interests.
Flextel would admit that its offered solution may still not be optimum for all stakeholders, but we challenge Ofcom to facilitate a proper, public debate involving all stakeholders, including consumers.
From Flextel's point of view it will stop some retailers charging up to £1 per minute for a call, that costs them less than 6p. CPL will expose rogue and rapacious corporate telecom pricing, that damages the UK economy, encourages scams. These scams cause Ofcom and PPP to tighten ineffective rules and regulations and so stifle innovation in the underlying bona fide market.
However, by delivering a simple call-price-check mechanism, CPL, will serve to protect the vulnerable citizen, promote competition and so drive down prices for the benefit of the consumer.
This should be Ofcom's (and the EU Commission's) overarching core strategy. Not a set of flawed micro-regulatory interventions for mobile termination/roaming rates, 070 personal numbers, 0870 numbers and 0871 numbers. These, whilst well meaning, threaten to disrupt markets and confuse consumers further. Furthermore they simultaneously reduce choice and serve to kill off grass roots competition and innovation.
We have already written to the CEO of Ofcom about our idea. If you feel you want to help please write to Ofcom about its intransigence in this area. You may also like to write to the Ofcom Consumer Panel which has a mandate with respect to championing consumer issues.